Z-340 VideoPhone Review Follow-Up
If you haven’t done so already, check out my initial impressions of the Z-340 VideoPhone. I have been using this unit for one month now and have made/received P2P and VRS calls.
While not scientific, I did notice that the unit takes a while to recharge; took roughly 3 hours for a full recharge. The videophone’s ‘standby’ time (i.e., running on battery power and ready to receive calls) seemed to last for roughly 2 hours, 20 minutes. No idea how long the videophone’s battery would last on a ‘talk’ time basis, i.e., using the unit in making a call. (I suspect it won’t be as long as 2 hours, 20 minutes!) So, while the battery life of the videophone may be adequate, I’d suggest carrying the wall brick.
One annoying tendency is that when I power the videophone on, the battery sometimes can be depleted already, just when I know it should be fully charged. Maybe it could be the case that I didn’t ‘log off’ while turning off the unit for the day? I really didn’t test this further, as I can simply plug in the videophone and power it up.
I love its form factor! I can put it in my car’s glovebox compartment, or in a portable filing cabinet along with my files. Due to the nature of my job (I travel to different schools), this portability has been the videophone’s biggest asset. And connecting the videophone at various locations (either via Wi-Fi or ethernet) is really simple. No need to configure the router, adjust settings, etc. The videophone simply works.
As for making calls, the video quality is pretty good, quite clear, with very little artifacting and pixellating. This is probably due to the fact that I have high speed connections. I can easily make calls via ZVRS, and even have used ZVRS’s Espanol translation services. The wait time was fairly short (a few seconds at the most), and the quality of the interpreters were acceptable. Calls were made during normal ’9 to 5′ hours. I have not made any calls to any other VRS provider, so I really can’t comment on Z-340′s interoperability.
I also have made some P2P calls (admittedly to other users who have Z-340′s) and have been very satisfied with the video calling experience. Video was clear and smooth. My experience in calling Sorenson VP 200 users have been limited, though. I was able to call one person’s VP 200, but he wasn’t there. I haven’t received calls from a VP 200 phone. For what it’s worth…
My only snit with this videophone is the lack of a visual ring alert, and a lack of an alert for incoming P2P calls. (What is this “Who Just Called” feature?) The Z-Alert feature of ZVRS does work for missed VRS calls. I did get a ‘videomail’ sent to my regular email address instead of my blackberry email address. The end result of that snafu was that I did not receive this person’s message until I have gotten home. I have configured my Videomail settings and hopefully it’ll work this time around.